Role of chemical substances from fish hosts in hatching and host-finding in monogeneans

22Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Hatching responses to chemical stimuli appear to have evolved independently in different kinds of monogenean skin and gill parasites of fishes, particularly in those parasites associated with bottom-dwelling hosts. Some monogeneans, such as Entobdella soleae, have two hatching strategies, responding readily to host skin mucus but hatching spontaneously in small numbers in the absence of the host. Other monogeneans, such as Acanthocotyle lobianchi, have abandoned spontaneous hatching and rely entirely on a "sit- and-wait" strategy, but improvements in the speed of hatching provide opportunities to take advantage of brief periods of contact between the eggs and the host. This has led to the loss of ciliated epidermal cells and to the inability to swim. Comparison of the eggs and hatching responses of two unrelated monogeneans, Leptocotyle minor and Hexabothrium appendiculatum, which share the same dogfish host, reveals evidence of convergence. Small, stable molecules such as urea, excreted by the host, have been implicated as hatching stimulants in monogeneans. There is evidence that host recognition in E. soleae is by chemoperception but, in contrast with the lack of specificity of the chemical hatching stimuli, this appears to be of a specific nature. © 1986 Plenum Publishing Corporation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kearn, G. C. (1986). Role of chemical substances from fish hosts in hatching and host-finding in monogeneans. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 12(8), 1651–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022371

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free