Enharrisment: a Reply to John Harris about Moral Enhancement

7Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In his reply to our response (both in this issue) to his book How to be Good, John Harris accuses us of saying ‘two mutually contradictory things’ (2016: 1) when in fact we talk about two different things. In this short response, we distinguish between moral enhancement and interventions which promote moral behaviour but undermine freedom. We argue that moral enhancement does not necessarily undermine freedom. Interventions, such as the God Machine, which do undermine freedom are not moral enhancements as we conceive of them. But they might nonetheless be justified because freedom must be balanced against other values, such as well-being.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2016). Enharrisment: a Reply to John Harris about Moral Enhancement. Neuroethics, 9(3), 275–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-016-9274-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free