Deriving pretty-big-step semantics from small-step semantics

13Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Big-step semantics for languages with abrupt termination and/or divergence suffer from a serious duplication problem, addressed by the novel 'pretty-big-step' style presented by Charguéraud at ESOP'13. Such rules are less concise than corresponding small-step rules, but they have the same advantages as big-step rules for program correctness proofs. Here, we show how to automatically derive pretty-big-step rules directly from small-step rules by 'refocusing'. This gives the best of both worlds: we only need to write the relatively concise small-step specifications, but our reasoning can be big-step as well as small-step. The use of strictness annotations to derive small-step congruence rules gives further conciseness. © 2014 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bach Poulsen, C., & Mosses, P. D. (2014). Deriving pretty-big-step semantics from small-step semantics. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 8410 LNCS, pp. 270–289). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-54833-8_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free