UP and the low and high hierarchies: A relativized separation

1Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The low and high hierarchies within NP were introduced by Schöning in order to classify sets in NP. It is not known whether the low and high hierarchies include all sets in NP. In this paper, we provide evidence that the class UP may fall in the gap between the low and high hierarchies. Using the circuit lower bound techniques of Hästad and Ko, we construct an oracle set relative to which UP is not in any level of the low and high hierarchies. Since it is known that UPA is low for PPA for all sets A, our result also shows that the interaction between UP and PP is crucial for the lowness of UP for PP; changing the base class to any level of the polynomial-time hierarchy destroys the lowness of UP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sheu, M. J., & Long, T. J. (1992). UP and the low and high hierarchies: A relativized separation. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 623 LNCS, pp. 174–185). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-55719-9_73

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free