Is surgical Apgar score an effective assessment tool for the prediction of postoperative complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy?

Abstract

A best evidence topic in thoracic surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the surgical Apgar score (SAS) was an effective assessment tool for the prediction of postoperative complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. In total, 7 papers were identified using the reported search, of which 6 cohort studies represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. Five of 6 cohort studies demonstrated that a low SAS was significantly associated with more postoperative complications in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. The rates of major individual complications in patients with a lower SAS were commonly higher than those in patients with a higher SAS. Two cohort studies further reported that a low SAS was significantly associated with the prolonged length of stay. The cut-off value of the SAS that had the discriminative power for patients who were considered at high morbidity risk, however, was not defined but was more likely to be 6 or less. Current available evidence suggests that the SAS system may serve as an effective assessment tool for the prediction of morbidity risk after oesophagectomy.