Freeze-drying versus heat-drying: Effect on protein-based superabsorbent material

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Porcine plasma protein is a by-product of the meat industry, which has already been applied in the manufacture of superabsorbent materials. The effects of plasticizer content (0%, 25%, 50%), together with those of the drying method (freeze-drying, thermal drying at 50◦C), during the processing of superabsorbent porcine plasma matrices were studied in this manuscript. Although the presence of glycerol accelerated the water absorption kinetics, the highest water absorption (~550%) was achieved by samples not containing any plasticizer. Viscoelasticity decreased at higher glycerol contents and especially after water absorption. When swollen samples were dried through freeze-drying, porous structures with a sponge-like appearance were obtained. Oppositely, thermally dried samples suffered an evident shrinkage that reduced porosity, displaying a more uniform surface. The effect of the drying method was observed since only freeze-dried samples can be rehydrated, displaying a superabsorbent ability (absorption higher than 1000%), which could be used in several applications (food, agriculture, personal care).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Álvarez-Castillo, E., Bengoechea, C., Felix, M., & Guerrero, A. (2021). Freeze-drying versus heat-drying: Effect on protein-based superabsorbent material. Processes, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9061076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free