The efficacy and safety of entecavir and interferon combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A meta-analysis

16Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of entecavir (ETV) and interferon (IFN) combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) mono-infection via a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All eligible RCTs evaluating combination therapy for treating CHB were identified from nine electronic databases. A meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the Cochrane Systemic Review handbook. Eleven trials encompassing 1010 participants were included in this meta-analysis. It showed that at 12 and ≥ 96 weeks of therapy, the combination of ETV and IFN was not better than ETV in improving the undetectable HBV DNA (12 weeks: RR=1.12, 95% CI=0.88-1.42; ≥ 96 weeks: RR = 0.64, 95% CI=0.21-1.98, respectively) and HBeAg sero conversion rates (12 weeks: RR=1.35, 95% CI=0.60-3.04; ≥ 96 weeks: RR=1.36, 95% CI=0.75-2.64, respectively). But at 48 weeks of therapy and approximately 2 years of follow up, combination therapy was superior to ETV in improving the undetectable HBV DNA (48 weeks: RR=1.46, 95% CI=1.13-1.90; follow up: RR=2.20, 95% CI=1.26-3.81, respectively) and HBeAg seroconversion rates (48 weeks: RR=1.82, 95% CI=1.44-2.30; follow up: RR=1.92, 95% CI=1.19-3.11, respectively). When compared to IFN group, at 24 and 48 weeks of therapy, combination group showed a greater undetectable HBV DNA (24 weeks: RR=2.14, 95% CI=1.59-2.89; 48 weeks: RR=2.28, 95% CI=1.54-3.37, respectively) and ALT normalization rate (24 weeks: RR=1.56, 95% CI= 1.24-1.96; 48 weeks: RR=1.55, 95% CI = 1.16-2.07, respectively). At 48 weeks of therapy, combination group achieved a greater HBeAg seroconversion rate than IFN (48 weeks: RR=1.58, 95% CI=1.24-2.00). No significant differences were observed in the side effects of the three therapies. So we can conclude that ETV and IFN combination therapy is more effective than ETV or IFN monotherapy in CHB treatment. ETV, IFN, and the combination of the two are safe in CHB treatment.

References Powered by Scopus

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement

53192Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions

36628Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

14747Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ciclopirox inhibits Hepatitis B Virus secretion by blocking capsid assembly

116Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Taiwan consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B

73Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

New Therapeutics for Hepatitis B: The Road to Cure

58Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xie, Q. L., Zhu, Y., Wu, L. H., Fu, L. L., & Xiang, Y. (2015). The efficacy and safety of entecavir and interferon combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE, 10(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132219

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

92%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

77%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

8%

Chemistry 1

8%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free