Physical vs. Virtual agent embodiment and effects on social interaction

50Citations
Citations of this article
66Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Previous work indicates that physical robots elicit more favorable social responses than virtual agents. These effects have been attributed to the physical embodiment. However, a recent meta-analysis by Li [1] suggests that the benefits of robots are due to physical presence rather than physical embodiment. To further explore the importance of presence we conducted a pilot study investigating the relationship between physical and social presence. The results suggest that social presence of an artificial agent is important for interaction with people, and that the extent to which it is perceived as socially present might be unaffected by whether it is physically or virtually present.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thellman, S., Silvervarg, A., Gulz, A., & Ziemke, T. (2016). Physical vs. Virtual agent embodiment and effects on social interaction. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 10011 LNAI, pp. 412–415). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47665-0_44

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free