Expert interpretation of bar and line graphs: The role of graphicacy in reducing the effect of graph format

19Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The distinction between informational and computational equivalence of representations, first articulated by Larkin and Simon (1987) has been a fundamental principle in the analysis of diagrammatic reasoning which has been supported empirically on numerous occasions. We present an experiment that investigates this principle in relation to the performance of expert graph users of 2 × 2 "interaction" bar and line graphs. The study sought to determine whether expert interpretation is affected by graph format in the same way that novice interpretations are. The findings revealed that, unlike novices-and contrary to the assumptions of several graph comprehension models-experts' performance was the same for both graph formats, with their interpretation of bar graphs being no worse than that for line graphs. We discuss the implications of the study for guidelines for presenting such data and for models of expert graph comprehension.

Figures

  • FIGURE 1 | The eight data sets used in the experiment.
  • TABLE 1 | Size of main effects and interactions for the eight graph stimuli.
  • FIGURE 2 | Mean number of main effect x, main effect z, and interaction descriptions (with 95% confidence intervals) for the two graph conditions.

Author supplied keywords

References Powered by Scopus

Perception in chess

2980Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words

2581Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe?

1251Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Engineering psychology and human performance

149Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Seeing data like an expert: An eye-tracking study using graphical data representations

32Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multivariate Visualization of Game Metrics: An Evaluation of Hexbin Maps

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peebles, D., & Ali, N. (2015). Expert interpretation of bar and line graphs: The role of graphicacy in reducing the effect of graph format. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(OCT). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01673

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

52%

Researcher 7

24%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

10%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

30%

Medicine and Dentistry 6

26%

Computer Science 5

22%

Social Sciences 5

22%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 2

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0