We outline an approach for developing and comparing silvicultural alternatives. The approach has multiple advantages, including explicit links between goals, management approaches, and outcomes; efficient development of alternative means of accomplishing the goals; and effective communication of potential tradeoffs between both objectives and alternatives. Copyright © 2010 by the Society of American Foresters.
CITATION STYLE
Long, J. N., Smith, F. W., & Roberts, S. D. (2010). Developing and comparing silvicultural alternatives: Goals, objectives, and evaluation criteria. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 25(2), 96–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/25.2.96
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.