In search of consistency: Scandinavian approaches to resuscitation of extremely preterm infants

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Guidelines around the resuscitation of extremely preterm infants have been developed, in part, to ensure consistency in decision-making between hospitals and health professionals. However, such guidelines can also be used to highlight other forms of inconsistency: between countries and between practices in different areas of medicine. In this article, we highlight the ethical advantages (and disadvantages) of consistency. We argue that an internationally uniform approach to ethically complex decisions is neither likely nor desirable.

References Powered by Scopus

One-year survival of extremely preterm infants after active perinatal care in Sweden

550Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden

453Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: Physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countries

347Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Neonatologists’ preferences regarding guidelines for periviable deliveries: do we really know what we want?

17Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neonatal end-of-life decision making: The possible behavior of greek physicians, midwives, and nurses in clinical scenarios

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Ethical considerations regarding the treatment of extremely preterm infants at the limit of viability: a comprehensive review

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wilkinson, D., & Hayden, D. (2018, September 1). In search of consistency: Scandinavian approaches to resuscitation of extremely preterm infants. Pediatrics. American Academy of Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2018-0478N

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

57%

Researcher 3

43%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

44%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

33%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

11%

Engineering 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free