Work-related outcomes in randomised placebo-controlled pain trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Chronic painful conditions have an important influence on the ability to work. Work-related outcomes, however, are not commonly reported in publications on trials investigating the treatment of chronic painful conditions. We aim to provide an overview of the reporting of work-related outcomes in such trials and investigate the relationship between work-related outcomes and pain outcomes. Methods. We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed with the aim of identifying randomised placebo-controlled clinical trials investigating treatments for chronic painful conditions or rheumatic diseases that also reported on work-related outcomes. Methodological study quality was assessed with the Oxford Quality Scale (OQS). Meta-analyses were conducted for the outcomes of interference with work and number of patients with at least 30% reduction in pain intensity (30% pain responders). The correlation between work-related and pain outcomes was investigated with regression analyses. Results: We included 31 publications reporting on 27 datasets from randomised placebo-controlled trials (with a total of 11,434 study participants) conducted in chronic painful or rheumatic diseases and reporting on work-related outcomes. These 31 publications make up only about 0.2% of all publications on randomised placebo-controlled trials in such conditions. The methodological quality of the included studies was high; only nine studies scored less than four (out of a maximum five) points on the OQS. Sixteen different work-related outcomes were reported on in the studies. Of 25 studies testing for the statistical significance of changes in work-related outcomes over the course of the trials, 14 (56%) reported a significant improvement; the others reported non-significant changes. Eight studies reported data on both interference with work and 30% pain responders: meta-analyses demonstrated similar, statistically significant improvements in both these outcomes with active therapy compared to placebo and regression analysis showed that these outcomes were correlated. Conclusions: Despite the importance of pain as a reason for decreased ability to work, work-related outcomes are reported in substantially less than 1% of publications on placebo-controlled trials in chronic painful and rheumatic diseases. Work-related outcomes and pain responder outcomes are closely related. © 2014 Wolf et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

References Powered by Scopus

Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?

14750Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment

4098Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: Results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial (ASSERT)

779Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Psychological Factors as Outcome Predictors for Spinal Cord Stimulation

27Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Organizational types in relation to exposure at work and sickness–a repeated cross-sectional study within public dentistry

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Work-related outcomes in randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trials in osteoarthritis - Are they adequately reported in journal publications? A systematic review

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolf, I., Friede, T., Hallier, E., & Straube, S. (2014). Work-related outcomes in randomised placebo-controlled pain trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6673-9-25

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

50%

Researcher 6

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 11

52%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5

24%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

19%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free