Prevalence of faecal ESBL carriage in the community and in a hospital setting in a county of Southern Sweden

40Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria in patients at various hospital wards and in a group of relatively healthy volunteers, in order to obtain greater knowledge on how common these bacterial strains are in hospital settings and in the general community. Participants (n = 427) were enrolled at a University Hospital and at Primary Health Care Units (PHCUs) in Sweden in 2008 and 2010. The participants provided rectal swabs, which were tested for the occurrence of ESBL-producing bacteria. Positive samples were analysed with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods for bacterial strain typing and ESBL phylogroups. In 2008, the prevalence was 2.1% (2/96) in PHCU subjects and 1.8% (2/113) in hospital patients. In 2010, the prevalence was 3.0% (3/100) in PHCU subjects and 6.8% (8/118) in hospital patients. The dominating phylogroups were CTX-M-1 and CTX-M-9. All ESBL-positive isolates were Escherichia coli. We found a higher prevalence of ESBL faecal carriage than expected, both in the hospital setting and in the PHCU group. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

References Powered by Scopus

2872Citations
2394Readers

This article is free to access.

Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Strömdahl, H., Tham, J., Melander, E., Walder, M., Edquist, P. J., & Odenholt, I. (2011). Prevalence of faecal ESBL carriage in the community and in a hospital setting in a county of Southern Sweden. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 30(10), 1159–1162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-011-1202-5

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 23

64%

Researcher 10

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

6%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 20

57%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

29%

Immunology and Microbiology 3

9%

Environmental Science 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0