Discussing anonymity metrics for mix based anonymity approaches

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Today the Chaumian Mix idea is not only an academic approach for anonymous communication, it is also a practical system with many variants used in real-world scenarios. It is therefore important to find an appropriate measure for the anonymity provided by these approaches. Many measurement approaches have been proposed that consider only the static state of the system without accounting for past and future information. Still other measurements evaluate only statistics. These measurements have in common that they do not measure when the anonymity function of the system is broken. Inspired by the idea of unicity distance in cryptography, and the mean time to failure in dependable systems, we believe that measuring the point at which the system fails to hide the relation between a sender and a receiver is a more appropriate measure of its anonymity. In this paper, we discuss our arguments with respect to existing measurement approaches. © IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2009.

References Powered by Scopus

Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems

7153Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms

3179Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The dining cryptographers problem: Unconditional sender and recipient untraceability

1069Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A new fuzzy-based approach for anonymity quantification in E-services

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pham, D. V., & Wright, J. (2009). Discussing anonymity metrics for mix based anonymity approaches. In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 309, pp. 149–168). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-05437-2_14

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

33%

Researcher 3

33%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 7

70%

Philosophy 1

10%

Arts and Humanities 1

10%

Psychology 1

10%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free