Inequality Measurement and The Rich: Why Inequality Increased More Than We Thought

6Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To compare income and wealth distributions and to assess the effects of policy that affect those distributions require reliable inequality-measurement tools. However, commonly used inequality measures such as the Gini coefficient have an apparently counter-intuitive property: income growth among the rich may actually reduce measured inequality. We show that there are just two inequality measures that both avoid this anomalous behavior and satisfy the principle of transfers. We further show that the recent increases in US income inequality are understated by the conventional Gini coefficient and explain why a simple alternative inequality measure should be preferred in practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cowell, F. A., & Flachaire, E. (2024). Inequality Measurement and The Rich: Why Inequality Increased More Than We Thought. Review of Income and Wealth, 70(2), 254–277. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12638

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free