Quantification of Conceptual Model Uncertainty in the Modeling of Wet Deposited Atmospheric Pollutants

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Conceptual model uncertainty and parameter uncertainty are dominant contributors to the total uncertainty of a radioecological model output. In the present study the focus is on conceptual model uncertainty, which is often not acknowledged. Conceptual model uncertainty is assessed by subtracting from the total uncertainty of the model output the propagated parameter uncertainty, obtained by means of Bayesian inference analysis. The conceptual model uncertainty is quantified for two process-based models, which describe the interception of wet deposited pollutants under equilibrium and kinetic conditions, respectively. The natural variability due the chemical valence of the elements considered is accounted for in both models. Quantitative evidence has been obtained that the conceptual model uncertainty can contribute to the total uncertainty budget of the models for interception of wet deposited pollutants at least as much as, if not more than, parameter uncertainty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urso, L., Sy, M. M., Gonze, M. A., Hartmann, P., & Steiner, M. (2022). Quantification of Conceptual Model Uncertainty in the Modeling of Wet Deposited Atmospheric Pollutants. Risk Analysis, 42(4), 757–769. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.13807

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free