Method comparisons for particulate nitrate, elemental carbon, and PM2.5 mass in seven U.S. cities

111Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Methods that measure PM2.5 mass, total particulate NO3-, and elemental carbon (EC) were evaluated in seven U.S. cities from 1997 to 1999. Sampling was performed in Bakersfield, CA; Boston, MA; Chicago, IL; Dallas, TX; Philadelphia, PA; Phoenix, AZ; and Riverside, CA. Evaluating and validating methods that measure the components of fine mass are important to the effort of establishing a speciation-monitoring network. The Harvard Impactor (HI), which measures fine particle mass, showed excellent agreement (r2 = 0.99) with the PM2.5 Federal Reference Method (FRM) for 81 24-hr samples in Riverside and Bakersfield. The HI also showed good precision (4.8%) for 243 24-hr collocated samples over eight studies. The Aethalometer was employed in six of the sampling locations to measure black carbon (BC). These values were compared to EC as measured from a quartz filter using thermal analysis. For the six cities combined, the two methods were highly correlated (r2 = 0.94; 187 24-hr samples); however, the BC values were approximately 24% less than the EC measurements consistently across all six cites. This compares well to results observed for EC/BC measurements observed in other semi-urban areas. Particulate NO3- was measured using the Harvard-EPA Annular Denuder System (HEADS). This was compared to the NO3- measured from the HI Teflon (DuPont) filter to assess NO3- artifacts. Significant NO3- losses (approximately 50% of total NO3-) were found in Riverside, Philadelphia, and Boston, while minimal artifacts were observed in the other sites. Two types of HEADS configurations were employed in five cities. One system used a Na2CO3-coated glass fiber filter, and the other type used a nylon filter to collect volatilized NO3- from the Teflon filter. The HEADS with the Na2CO3-coated filter consistently underestimated the total particulate NO3- by approximately 20% compared to the nylon HEADS. © 2000 Air & Waste Management Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babich, P., Davey, M., Allen, G., & Koutrakis, P. (2000). Method comparisons for particulate nitrate, elemental carbon, and PM2.5 mass in seven U.S. cities. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, 50(7), 1095–1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2000.10464152

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free