Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? the impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of "geneticism"

51Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Why does university exposure to a hierarchy-attenuating (HA) academic major (e.g., social science) lead to a decrease in anti-egalitarianism and group domination (social dominance orientation, SDO)? The reason for this well-documented phenomenon remains unclear. In the social sciences, the origins of differences in both behavior and personality are attributed more to social and environmental factors than to genetic ones. We hypothesized that the normative and informational influences of this academic major would lead to perceptions that genes have a less important role than nurture in the shaping of human behavior and personality. Our main hypothesis was confirmed. Decreased SDO among psychology students was mediated significantly by a decrease in belief in genetic determinism, the factor we called "geneticism." Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dambrun, M., Kamiejski, R., Haddadi, N., & Duarte, S. (2009). Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? the impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of “geneticism.” European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 88–100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.498

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free