An Epistemological Approach to the Symbol Grounding Problem: The Difference Between Perception and Demonstrative Knowledge and Two Ways of Being Meaningful

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I propose a formal approach towards solving Harnad’s “Symbol Grounding Problem” (SGP) through epistemological analogy. (Sect. 1) The SGP and Taddeo and Floridi’s “Zero Semantical Commitment Condition” (z-condition) for its solution are both revisited using Frege’s philosophy of language, in such a way that the SGP is converted into two circumscribed tasks. (Sect. 2) The ground for studying these tasks within human cognition is that both the human mind and AI are conceivable, as in Newell’s “physical symbol systems” (PSSs), and that they share the core of the SGP: the problem of constructing an objective reference. (Sect. 3) After two forms of reference have been identified in the human mind, I then show why the latter may constitute a model for facing the SGP.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guazzini, J. (2018). An Epistemological Approach to the Symbol Grounding Problem: The Difference Between Perception and Demonstrative Knowledge and Two Ways of Being Meaningful. In Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics (Vol. 44, pp. 36–39). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96448-5_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free