Contested regional orders and institutional balancing in the Asia Pacific

41Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The rise of the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) is gradually transforming the international system from a unipolar world toward multipolarity. China's ascent not only challenges US domination, but also intensifies the institutionalization of security in the Asia Pacific. On the basis of institutional balancing theory, I argue that (i) China's rise has led to a competition among different regional orders, that is, the US-led bilateralism versus ASEAN-centered and China-supported multilateralism. However, conflicts or wars are not inevitable since the contested regional orders can coexist in the Asia Pacific. (ii) The deepening economic interdependence has encouraged regional powers, including the United States, China and ASEAN, to rely on different institutional balancing strategies to pursue security after the Cold War.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, K. (2015). Contested regional orders and institutional balancing in the Asia Pacific. International Politics, 52(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2014.46

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free