Incidence and clinical significance of 30-day and 90-day rehospitalization for heart failure among patients with acute decompensated heart failure in Japan ― from the NARA-HF study ―

7Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Countermeasure development for early rehospitalization for heart failure (re-HHF) is an urgent and important issue in Western countries and Japan. Methods and Results: Of 1,074 consecutive NARA-HF study participants with acute decompensated HF admitted to hospital as an emergency between January 2007 and December 2016, we excluded 291 without follow-up data, who died in hospital, or who had previous HF-related hospitalizations, leaving 783 in the analysis. During the median follow-up period of 895 days, 241 patients were re-admitted for HF. The incidence of re-HHF was the highest within the first 30 days of discharge (3.3% [26 patients]) and remained high until 90 days, after which it decreased sharply. Within 90 days of discharge, 63 (8.0%) patients were re-admitted. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that patients with 90-day re-HHF had worse prognoses than those without 90-day re-HHF in terms of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 2.321, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.654-3.174; P<0.001) and cardiovascular death (HR 3.396, 95% CI 2.153-5.145; P<0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated that only male sex was an independent predictor of 90-day re-HHF. Conclusions: The incidence of early re-HHF was lower in Japan than in Western countries. Its predictors are not related to the clinical factors of HF, indicating that a new comprehensive approach might be needed to prevent early re-HHF.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ishihara, S., Kawakami, R., Nogi, M., Hirai, K., Hashimoto, Y., Nakada, Y., … Saito, Y. (2020). Incidence and clinical significance of 30-day and 90-day rehospitalization for heart failure among patients with acute decompensated heart failure in Japan ― from the NARA-HF study ―. Circulation Journal, 84(2), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0620

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free