In Silico Target-Specific siRNA Design Based on Domain Transfer in Heterogeneous Data

4Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

RNA interference via exogenous small interference RNAs (siRNA) is a powerful tool in gene function study and disease treatment. Designing efficient and specific siRNA on target gene remains the key issue in RNAi. Although various in silico models have been proposed for rational siRNA design, most of them focus on the efficiencies of selected siRNAs, while limited effort has been made to improve their specificities targeted on specific mRNAs, which is related to reducing off-target effects (OTEs) in RNAi. In our study, we propose for the first time that the enhancement of target specificity of siRNA design can be achieved computationally by domain transfer in heterogeneous data sources from different siRNA targets. A transfer learning based method i.e., heterogeneous regression (HEGS) is presented for target-specific siRNA efficacy modeling and feature selection. Based on the model, (1) the target regression model can be built by extracting information from related data in other targets/experiments, thus increasing the target specificity in siRNA design with the help of information from siRNAs binding to other homologous genes, and (2) the potential features correlated to the current siRNA design can be identified even when there is lack of experimental validated siRNA affinity data on this target. In summary, our findings present useful instructions for a better target-specific siRNA design, with potential applications in genome-wide high-throughput screening of effective siRNA, and will provide further insights on the mechanism of RNAi. © 2012 Liu et al.

Figures

  • Table 1. Description for 31 siRNA sub-datasets.
  • Figure 1. Computational framework of our study.
  • Figure 2. General outline of HEGS model.
  • Table 2. The HEGS Algorithm.
  • Table 3. Comparison of the baseline strategy and a simple data combination and normalization strategy in siRNA efficacy prediction.
  • Figure 3. Distribution difference of the output values in Dataset 1 and 2 (Although the output values of Dataset 1 and 2 are scaled to [0, 1], the distribution between these two datasets is different).
  • Figure 4. Comparison between the baseline strategy and HEGS in siRNA efficacy prediction (the parameter l of ridge regression were kept the same). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050697.g004
  • Table 4. Pair t-test p-values for the comparison between HEGS and baseline with different percentages of training data for 10 datasets.

References Powered by Scopus

MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods

36464Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A survey on transfer learning

18291Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Origins and Mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs

4238Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Short-interference RNAs: Becoming medicines

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Reconsideration of in silico siRNA design from a perspective of heterogeneous data integration: Problems and solutions

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

In Silico Design of siRNAs for Silencing CLEC5A Receptor as a Potential Therapeutic Approach Against Dengue and Japanese Encephalitis Virus Infection in Human

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, Q., Zhou, H., Zhang, K., Shi, X., Fan, W., Zhu, R., … Cao, Z. (2012). In Silico Target-Specific siRNA Design Based on Domain Transfer in Heterogeneous Data. PLoS ONE, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0050697

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

63%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

19%

Researcher 2

13%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

56%

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Bi... 4

22%

Computer Science 2

11%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0