An empirical investigation of college students’ acceptance of translation technologies

5Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With the advancement of information technology and artificial intelligence, translation technologies have seen rapid development in language services and increasing integration in higher education. However, research on factors affecting students’ acceptance of these technologies remains limited. This study intends to formulate and test an extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) incorporating computer self-efficacy and perceived enjoyment to investigate students’ adoption of translation technologies. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 370 college students in China experienced with using translation technologies. The results from the structural equation modeling demonstrated a positive prediction on perceived ease of use and enjoyment from computer self-efficacy. Perceived enjoyment increased perceived ease of use and attitudes. Perceived ease of use positively influenced perceived usefulness and attitudes. Finally, attitudes positively predicted greater behavioral intentions to use translation technologies. However, computer self-efficacy was identified to have no significant effect on perceived usefulness. The study makes significant theoretical contributions by expanding TAM and offering practical guidance to improve students’ acceptance of translation technologies in tertiary education.

References Powered by Scopus

Get full text
39806Citations
44619Readers
Get full text

User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view

27410Citations
31144Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, X., Gao, Z., & Liao, H. (2024). An empirical investigation of college students’ acceptance of translation technologies. PLoS ONE, 19(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297297

Readers over time

‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 6

38%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

38%

Researcher 3

19%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 5

36%

Social Sciences 4

29%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

21%

Arts and Humanities 2

14%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0