Comparison between CBT and PBT: Assessment of Gap-filling and Multiple-choice Cloze in Reading Comprehension

  • Li M
  • Pu H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The main purpose of the article is to determine whether there is equivalence between computer based test and paper based test. A lot of comparable research has been conducted to investigate the equivalence between two test formats, but their results are inconsistent, which causes controversy in the field of research. Moreover, many of these studies are conducted in the other countries, especially in the USA, but few in China. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct the respective research in the Chinese context. Based on Honaker’s two standards for equivalence of computer based test and paper based test, the experiment is made to explore the equivalence between CBT and PBT.CBT; PBT; psychometric equivalence; experiential equivalence

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Li, M., & Pu, H. (2010). Comparison between CBT and PBT: Assessment of Gap-filling and Multiple-choice Cloze in Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.6.935-941

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free