PERBEDAAN PERSEPSI AKADEMISI DAN PRAKTISI AKUNTANSI TENTANG AKUNTANSI FORENSIK SEBAGAI MATA KULIAH

  • Putra M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the difference between academics and practitioners perceptions about interest, relevance, methods of integration, continuing education, and competency of forensic accountants. Object of research was academics with practitioners in the province of Central Java. This research was empirical study using purposive sampling technique in data collection. Data was obtained by distributing questionnaires by 196 universities in Central Java and government institutions BPKP and BPK representation of Central Java. A total of 165 respondents (84.18%) consisting of 78 people from academia, and 87 people from the practitioner has provided a responses. Data was analyzed by Independent Sample t Test with IBM SPSS version 21 software package. Hypothesis testing results indicate that there are significant differences in perception between academics and practitioners on forensic accounting as course.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Putra, M. A. (2018). PERBEDAAN PERSEPSI AKADEMISI DAN PRAKTISI AKUNTANSI TENTANG AKUNTANSI FORENSIK SEBAGAI MATA KULIAH. JURNAL STIE SEMARANG, 10(2), 01–21. https://doi.org/10.33747/stiesmg.v10i2.195

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free