Analysis of Factors Affecting Early Functional Recovery of Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: To explore factors affecting the efficacy of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 44 patients with hip dysplasia who underwent Bernese periacetabular osteotomy with a modified Smith-Peterson approach between January 2017 and November 2019. Among them, 40 were women and four were men. The average age was 31.2 ± 9.4. Preoperative and postoperative imaging parameters were measured. The acetabular top tilt angle, lateral central edge angle, acetabular abduction angle, femoral head extrusion index, sphericity index of femoral head, Shenton line, Tonnis grade of osteoarthritis, joint congruency, p/a ratio, acetabular anteversion angle, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scale scores, and modified Harris hip score (MHHS) were observed. MHHS were divided into three clinically relevant categories: poor (<70 points), good (70–85 points), and excellent (86–91 points). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters, were subjected to univariate logistic regression analysis. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine factors influencing postoperative MHHS. Results: The follow-up time was 1.0–3.9 years after surgery, with an average of 1.6 years. By the last follow-up, MHHS increased from 70 points before surgery to 91 points after surgery (P < 0.001), WOMAC pain score decreased from 4 points before surgery to 0 points after surgery (P < 0.001). WOMAC functional score decreased (Preoperative: 18.0 [4.0]; Postoperative: 4.0 [0], P = 0.004). Six patients had sensory disturbance of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, four of which recovered completely during follow-up. No other complications related to surgical approach, osteotomy, acetabular displacement, acetabular fixation, and postoperative stage were found. There was no significant vascular, nerve, or visceral injuries in any of the patients. On multiple regression analysis, the probability of the postoperative modified Harris hip score of a hip joint with a preoperative lateral center edge angle ≥4.5° being classified as excellent was six times that of angles <4.5° (Exp[β]: 6.249, 95% CI: 1.03–37.85, P = 0.046). Regression analysis of other factors found no significant correlation with postoperative functional scores. Conclusion: Overall functional scores post-PAO significantly improved, and pain symptoms were significantly reduced. Patients with a preoperative lateral center edge angle ≥4.5° had better joint function after surgery.

References Powered by Scopus

A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip

941Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Morphologic Features of Congenital Acetabular Dysplasia: One in Six is Retroverted

192Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impingement adversely affects 10-year survivorship after periacetabular osteotomy for DDH hip

175Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Incidence and clinical outcome of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury after periacetabular osteotomy

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Functional and radiological outcomes and complications of Bernese periacetabular osteotomy through modified Stoppa approach

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Construction of a predictive nomogram for functional recovery after Bernese periacetabular osteotomy

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gu, Y. ge, Shi, Z. wei, Yue, Y. hui, Yan, Z. long, Yin, L. xu, Zhang, Y. yong, … Yan, X. feng. (2021). Analysis of Factors Affecting Early Functional Recovery of Bernese Periacetabular Osteotomy. Orthopaedic Surgery, 13(6), 1818–1827. https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13119

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 5

45%

Researcher 4

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 8

62%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

23%

Chemical Engineering 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free