Discrimination

0Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Given the fragmentation of the idea of the moral person described in Chapter 2, one may wonder whether the principle of respect for persons can have any relevance to contemporary ethics. I will argue that the apparent irrelevance of the principle is an illusion, stemming from an excessively restrictive view of the phenomena with which ethics must deal. This chapter begins the process of demonstrating the ongoing relevance of the principle, focusing on the phenomenon of discrimination. Discrimination proves to be more than just procedural injustice, since it crucially involves the interpretation of its victims. To be discriminated against is to be treated in a procedurally unjust manner as a member of this or that social group. Discrimination thus proves to be an interpretive moral wrong. The existence and nature of interpretive moral wrongs suggest that moral patiency is a more complex matter than might have been thought, on the basis of traditional accounts of respect for persons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lucas, P. (2011). Discrimination. In Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy (Vol. 26, pp. 39–51). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1560-8_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free