Bottom-up perceptual organization of images into object part hypotheses

2Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The demise of "segmentation-then-recognition" strategy led to a paradigm shift toward feature-based discriminative recognition with significant success. However, increased complexity in multi-class datasets reveals that local low-level features may not be sufficiently discriminative, requiring the construction and use of more complex structural features which are necessarily category independent. The paper proposes a bottom-up procedure for generating fragment features which are intended to be object part hypotheses. Suggesting that the demise of segmentation to generate a representation suitable for recognition was due to prematurely committing to a grouping option in the face of ambiguities, the proposed framework considers and tracks multiple alternate grouping options. This approach is made tractable by (i) using a medial fragment representation which allows for the simultaneous use of multiple cues, (ii) a set of transforms to effect grouping operations, (iii) a containment graph representation which avoids duplicate consideration of possibilities, and the estimation of the likelihood of a grouping sequence to retain only plausible groupings. The resulting hypotheses are evaluated intrinsically by measuring their ability to represent objects with a few fragments. They are also evaluated by comparison to algorithms which aim to generate full object segments, with results that match or exceed the state of art, thus demonstrating the suitability of the proposed mid-level representation. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Narayanan, M., & Kimia, B. (2012). Bottom-up perceptual organization of images into object part hypotheses. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7572 LNCS, pp. 257–271). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33718-5_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free