Strongly unforgeable signatures based on computational Diffie-Hellman

188Citations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A signature system is said to be strongly unforgeable if the signature is existentially unforgeable and, given signatures on some message m, the adversary cannot produce a new signature on m. Strongly unforgeable signatures are used for constructing chosen-ciphertext secure systems and group signatures. Current efficient constructions in the standard model (i.e. without random oracles) depend on relatively strong assumptions such as Strong-RSA or Strong-Diffie-Hellman. We construct an efficient strongly unforgeable signature system based on the standard Computational Diffie-Hellman problem in bilinear groups. © International Association for Cryptologic Research 2006.

References Powered by Scopus

Digital signature scheme secure against adaptive chosen-message attacks

1989Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Efficient Identity-Based Encryption without random oracles

1726Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Short Group Signatures

1529Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Provably secure ciphertext policy ABE

761Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Two-tier signatures, strongly unforgeable signatures, and Fiat-Shamir without random oracles

105Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Strongly unforgeable signatures and hierarchical identity-based signatures from lattices without random oracles

96Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boneh, D., Shen, E., & Waters, B. (2006). Strongly unforgeable signatures based on computational Diffie-Hellman. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3958 LNCS, pp. 229–240). https://doi.org/10.1007/11745853_15

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 40

68%

Researcher 9

15%

Professor / Associate Prof. 5

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 5

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 53

87%

Engineering 4

7%

Social Sciences 2

3%

Physics and Astronomy 2

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0