Field investigation of preferential fissure flow paths with hydrochemical analysis of small-scale sprinkling experiments

17Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The unsaturated zone largely controls groundwater recharge by buffering precipitation while at the same time providing preferential flow paths for infiltration. The importance of preferential flow on landslide hydrology is recognised in the literature; however, its monitoring and quantification remain difficult. This paper presents a combined hydrological and hydrochemical analysis of small-scale sprinkling experiments. It aims at showing the potential of such experiments for studying the spatial differences in dominant hydrological processes within a landslide. This methodology was tested in the highly heterogeneous black marls of the Super-Sauze landslide. The tests were performed in three areas characterised by different displacement rates, surface morphology and local hydrological conditions. Special attention was paid to testing the potential of small-scale sprinkling experiments for identifying and characterising preferential flow patterns and dominant hydrological processes.

Figures

  • Figure 1. (a) The upper part of the Super-Sauze landslide with indicated location of three sprinkling tests (plot A, B and C); the white dashed lines indicate the hydro-geomorphological units (after Malet et al. 2005). (b) Schematic representation of the experimental setup of each area (not scaled): grey squares represent 1× 1 m2 sprinkling plots, dots represent the location of the piezometers, numbers in brackets indicate the depth of the piezometers in metres, crosses indicate the location of the theta probes, undulating lines indicate fissure distribution within the sprinkling plots, and arrows show the local slope direction in the area. (c) Photographs of the soil surface of each sprinkling area with arrows showing the local slope direction in the area.
  • Figure 2. Monitoring results of three sprinkling experiments: (a) plot A, (b) plot B and (c) plot C. Upper panels show the intensity of the sprinkling (primary y axis) and groundwater responses in piezometers (secondary y axis). Middle and bottom panels show the ratio between tracer concentration measured in the piezometers or subsurface runoff (SSF) and the applied tracer concentration.
  • Figure 3. Drawdown curves observed in piezometers A1, B1 and C2 after the end of sprinkling experiments and corresponding depletion factors K [min].
  • Table 1. Measured (m) and estimated (e) components of water balance for each plot, with the assumption that whole experience area is hydrologically active.
  • Figure 4. Schematic representation of water balance components of experimental plots. P is sprinkling volume; VOF is volume of overland flow; VSSF is volume of subsurface flow; Pe is volume of “deep percolation”; VGW, in and VGW,out are volumes of groundwater inflow and outflow, respectively; ht is the groundwater level at time t (t = 0 – just before the sprinkling starts; t = end – at the end of sprinkling experiment); and hmax is maximal groundwater level observed during sprinkling experiment.
  • Figure 5. EMMA model results for the centrally located piezometers A1 (a), B1 (b) and C1 (c). The full triangles are estimates for the first day of the experiment and the open dots represents second day of the experiment. The grey line is the 1 : 1 line.
  • Table 2. Measured (m) and estimated (e) tracer mass balance components and the evaluation of the hydrologically active area assumptions.
  • Figure 6. Flow regimes derived from hydrological and hydrochemical analysis of small-scale sprinkling experiment and their distribution across the upper part of the Super-Sauze landslide. The white dashed lines indicate the hydro-geomorphological (HG) units defined by Malet et al. (2005).

References Powered by Scopus

Macropores and water flow in soils

2206Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: Principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality

1034Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Review and comparison of models for describing non-equilibrium and preferential flow and transport in the vadose zone

795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Dynamic earth system and ecological controls of rainfall-initiated landslides

227Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Addressing Two Bottlenecks to Advance the Understanding of Preferential Flow in Soils

104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Analysis of plant root-induced preferential flow and pore-water pressure variation by a dual-permeability model

50Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Krzeminska, D. M., Bogaard, T. A., Debieche, T. H., Cervi, F., Marc, V., & Malet, J. P. (2014). Field investigation of preferential fissure flow paths with hydrochemical analysis of small-scale sprinkling experiments. Earth Surface Dynamics, 2(1), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2-181-2014

Readers over time

‘14‘16‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

72%

Researcher 4

22%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Earth and Planetary Sciences 6

40%

Environmental Science 6

40%

Engineering 2

13%

Energy 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0