Increased Attentional Focus Modulates Eye Movements in a Mixed Antisaccade Task for Younger and Older Adults

10Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We examined performance in the antisaccade task for younger and older adults by comparing latencies and errors in what we defined as high attentional focus (mixed antisaccades and prosaccades in the same block) and low attentional focus (antisaccades and prosaccades in separate blocks) conditions. Shorter saccade latencies for correctly executed eye movements were observed for both groups in mixed, compared to blocked, antisaccade tasks, but antisaccade error rates were higher for older participants across both conditions. The results are discussed in relation to the inhibitory hypothesis, the goal neglect theory and attentional control theory. © 2013 Wang et al.

References Powered by Scopus

Working Memory, Comprehension, and Aging: A Review and a New View

2966Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Anxiety and Performance: The Processing Efficiency Theory

1714Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity

1104Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Coupled symmetric and asymmetric circuits underlying spatial orientation in fruit flies

34Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Age-related deficits in voluntary control over saccadic eye movements: Consideration of electrical brain stimulation as a therapeutic strategy

16Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conflict Resolution as Near-Threshold Decision-Making: A Spiking Neural Circuit Model with Two-Stage Competition for Antisaccadic Task

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, J., Tian, J., Wang, R., & Benson, V. (2013). Increased Attentional Focus Modulates Eye Movements in a Mixed Antisaccade Task for Younger and Older Adults. PLoS ONE, 8(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061566

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

10%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

5%

Researcher 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 11

61%

Medicine and Dentistry 3

17%

Neuroscience 2

11%

Mathematics 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free