An Address from Elsewhere: Vulnerability, Relationality, and Conceptions of Creaturely Embodiment

4Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

How do our conceptions of embodiment shape the prospects of thinking relationally about humans and other living beings? This chapter pursues this question in the form of a critical engagement with the idea of ‘Vulnerability’ and its role as a conceptual bedrock in which a distinctly post anthropocentric ethics can be grounded. While the lens of vulnerability enables us to articulate a critique of anthropogenic violence against other creatures, my concern is with the specific form of embodied relationality suggested by a perspective that is centered on the negative aspects of exposure, injurability, and finitude. I argue that, in order for us to envision a more affirmative ethics of human-animal relationality, we need more lively corporeal ontologies and an idea of vulnerability that emphasizes the richness of bodily life as a radically ambivalent openness to the world and other bodies instead of a restrictive focus on the shared passivity of bodily exposure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ohrem, D. (2017). An Address from Elsewhere: Vulnerability, Relationality, and Conceptions of Creaturely Embodiment. In Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature (pp. 43–75). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free