How do our conceptions of embodiment shape the prospects of thinking relationally about humans and other living beings? This chapter pursues this question in the form of a critical engagement with the idea of ‘Vulnerability’ and its role as a conceptual bedrock in which a distinctly post anthropocentric ethics can be grounded. While the lens of vulnerability enables us to articulate a critique of anthropogenic violence against other creatures, my concern is with the specific form of embodied relationality suggested by a perspective that is centered on the negative aspects of exposure, injurability, and finitude. I argue that, in order for us to envision a more affirmative ethics of human-animal relationality, we need more lively corporeal ontologies and an idea of vulnerability that emphasizes the richness of bodily life as a radically ambivalent openness to the world and other bodies instead of a restrictive focus on the shared passivity of bodily exposure.
CITATION STYLE
Ohrem, D. (2017). An Address from Elsewhere: Vulnerability, Relationality, and Conceptions of Creaturely Embodiment. In Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature (pp. 43–75). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_3
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.