A comparative study between traditional topology optimization and lattice optimization for additive manufacturing

7Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Topology optimization (TO) aids designers to come up with new ideas that would be impossible to be designed without this technology. However, the optimized results are usually characterized by high geometric complexity, which makes almost impossible their manufacturing by conventional methods. Additive manufacturing (AM) overcomes this problem and increases the design flexibility. In addition, lattice structures with their porous infill combine the design flexibility with good material properties, such as high strength compared with relatively low mass. In this paper, the authors compare designs derived from traditional TO lattice optimization with respect to their tensile strength. A case study of a custom cylindrical model is used to support the theory and collect empirical data. The simulation data as well as the implemented methodology in this work can be used as a guidance for the designers looking for new lightweight design ideas for AM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tyflopoulos, E., & Steinert, M. (2020). A comparative study between traditional topology optimization and lattice optimization for additive manufacturing. Material Design and Processing Communications, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/mdp2.128

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free