Willingness-to-pay comparisons for flats of groundcover plants in plantable containers: Consumers versus commercial buyers in kentucky

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Increasing demand for groundcover plants and increasing consumer preference for more sustainable products encourage nursery crop producers and landscape management companies to assess efficiency and sustainable practices. Ajuga reptans ‘Bronze Beauty’ and Sedum kamtschaticum ‘Variegatum’ were grown in standard plastic containers or plantable containers (Ellepot and SoilWrap) and 12-or 18-count flats. These production alternatives were presented in personal surveys of commercial industry personnel and consumers to determine their willingness to pay for these attributes. A conjoint analysis revealed an affinity for both groups to purchase flats of groundcovers and preferred sedum over ajuga. Commercial buyers from larger companies were more likely to purchase plantable containers than those fromsmaller firms. Generally, flats of Ellepots were preferred over flats of SoilWraps and 18-count over 12-count flats by commercial buyers. Price had a negative impact on consumer willingness to pay. Consumers revealed no specific preference for the plantable containers, although preference for plastic containers declined with age and presence of children at home.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ingram, D. L., Woods, T. A., Hu, W., & Nambuthiri, S. S. (2015). Willingness-to-pay comparisons for flats of groundcover plants in plantable containers: Consumers versus commercial buyers in kentucky. HortScience, 50(3), 408–411. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.50.3.408

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free