From the rule of law to the rule of rules: technocracy and the crisis of EU governance

28Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article focuses on two trends emerging through the eurozone crisis, both of which diminish the quality of democracy in the EU and its member states. Firstly, the crisis has led to an increased reliance on non-majoritarian institutions, such as the ECB, at the expense of democratic accountability. Secondly, the crisis has led to a new emphasis on coercive enforcement at the expense of the voluntary cooperation that previously characterised (and sustained) the EU as a community of law. Thus, the ECB’s (over-)empowerment is a synecdoche of a wider problem: The EU’s tendency to resort to technocratic governance in the face of challenges that require political contestation. In the absence of opportunities for democratic contestation, EU emergency governance–Integration through Crisis–oscillates between moments of heightened politicisation, in which ad hoc decisions are justified as necessary, and the (sometimes coercive) appeal to the depoliticised rule of rules.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scicluna, N., & Auer, S. (2019). From the rule of law to the rule of rules: technocracy and the crisis of EU governance. West European Politics, 42(7), 1420–1442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1584843

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free