Where the action is

13Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article considers reactions at various levels of the Sōtō sect to the problems of funerary Buddhism, There is a widening gap, not only between the necessities of mortuary practice at local temples (both rural and urban) and the doctrine of no-self ostensibly embodied in the foundational texts of Dogen and Keizan, but also within the very organizational structures of the Sōtō sect itself. From its official publications and regional conferences to innovative strategies being developed at individual temples, I argue that, far from being a unified body, Sōtō Buddhism speaks with an array of competing and often contradictory voices. The diversity of Sōtō responses to the "mortuary problem" reveals intriguing disconnects between the research arm of the sect, those responsible for training priests, and the daily realities of local temples. © 2004 Nanzan Institute for Religion and Culture.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rowe, M. (2004). Where the action is. Japanese Journal of Religious Studies, 31(2), 357–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496405284356

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free