Impact of high-quality goals-of-care discussions on oncologist productivity

3Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

PURPOSE To study factors that have an impact on the conduct of high-quality goals of care (GoC) discussions and productivity of oncologists among four different practice settings in patients with advanced cancer. METHODS Solid-tumor oncologists from community, academic, municipal, and rural hospitals were randomly assigned to receive a coaching model of communication skills to help them facilitate a GoC discussion with newly diagnosed patients with advanced cancer who had a less-than-2-year prognosis. Patients were surveyed after the first restaging visit regarding the quality of the GoC discussion on a scale of 0 to 10 (0, worst; 10, best) with a score of 8 or better indicating a high-quality GoC discussion. Productivity was measured by work revenue value units (wRVUs) per hour for the day each oncologist saw the study patient after imaging. RESULTS The four sites differed significantly in the socioeconomic patient populations they served and in the characteristics of the oncologists who cared for the patients. Overall median productivity across the four sites was 3.6 wRVU/hour, with the highest observed in the community hospital (4.3 wRVU/hour) and the lowest in the rural setting (2.9 wRVU/hour; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pintova, S., Leibrandt, R., Smith, C. B., Adelson, K. B., Gonsky, J. P., Egorova, N., … Bickell, N. A. (2020). Impact of high-quality goals-of-care discussions on oncologist productivity. In Journal of Oncology Practice (Vol. 16, pp. E290–E297). American Society of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.19.00381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free