Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery

  • Laine T
  • Aarnio P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The spread of viral diseases such as HIV has highlighted the importance of protecting medical personnel against contamination from blood. We have assessed the frequency of the perforation of surgical gloves during orthopaedic and trauma surgery and compared the efficiency of single and double gloving.We examined all the gloves used by surgeons for a period of two months. There were 1769 gloves from 349 operations. Perforations occurred in 18.5% of conventional and 5.8% of arthroscopic procedures. The risk of contamination from blood was 13 times higher when using single compared with double gloves. Surprisingly, the combination of two regular gloves was much less efficient than double indicator gloves when comparing the rate of perforation of the inner glove when the outer had been damaged (24% vs 4.9%; p = 0.02).We recommend double gloving in orthopaedic surgery in general and also in long arthroscopic procedures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Laine, T., & Aarnio, P. (2004). Glove perforation in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 86-B(6), 898–900. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14821

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free