Conclusion: The Indiscipline of Design

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Chapter Seven concludes this book by reflecting on the “in-discipline” of design. Designers claim that their practices are transversal, multidisciplinary, and holistic. However, design is not a Leonardesque fantasy of mastering all the known disciplines, but rather the dynamic activity that launches concepts, facts, methods, between disciplines so that they can come up with new concepts and artifacts, or situations. Through design/practice, disciplines under-determine each other, leaving space for a radical unknown to emerge. The process of under-determination is considered here as the foundation of design epistemology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gentes, A. (2017). Conclusion: The Indiscipline of Design. In Design Research Foundations (pp. 213–247). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65984-8_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free