Integrating the two main inference modes of NKRL, transformations and hypotheses

7Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An application of NKRL (Narrative Knowledge Representation Language) techniques on terrorism documents supplied by the Greek Ministry of Defence (MoD) has been carried out in the context of the IST Parmenides project; this application has required implementing the integration between the two main inferencing modes of NKRL, 'hypotheses' and 'transformations'. 'Hypothesis rules' allow retrieving automatically from an NKRL knowledge base the information that can supply a context or a causal explanation for some known event. 'Transformation rules' facilitate the recovery of information from the base by 'adapting' (transforming) query/queries that failed to the real contents of this base. Integrating the two classes of rules means using the transformations to automatically modify the pre-defined reasoning steps of a hypothesis to build up more flexible and complete 'explanation' scenarios. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zarri, G. P. (2005). Integrating the two main inference modes of NKRL, transformations and hypotheses. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 3730 LNCS, pp. 304–340). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/11603412_10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free