This paper argues that the current academic debate about global civil society has reached a point where some assessment or reflection could be useful for informing the course of future research in the field. Behind this call for an assessment is the very nature of the debate and emerging gaps and weaknesses that together produce a potential slow-down in generating new knowledge and understanding of global civil society. There are several shortcomings to the current research approach: the failure to take account of other civil society traditions; the failure to address the relationship between global civil society, conflict, and violence; and, most critically, the neglect of the notion of civility, both conceptually and empirically. The balance of the paper then explores the implications of this new assessment of global civil society research. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007.
CITATION STYLE
Anheier, H. K. (2007). Reflections on the concept and measurement of global civil society. Voluntas, 18(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-007-9031-y
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.