A study of imitation learning methods for semantic role labeling

2Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Global features have proven effective in a wide range of structured prediction problems but come with high inference costs. Imitation learning is a common method for training models when exact inference isn't feasible. We study imitation learning for Semantic Role Labeling (SRL) and analyze the effectiveness of the Violation Fixing Perceptron (VFP) (Huang et al., 2012) and Locally Optimal Learning to Search (LOLS) (Chang et al., 2015) frameworks with respect to SRL global features. We describe problems in applying each framework to SRL and evaluate the effectiveness of some solutions. We also show that action ordering, including easy first inference, has a large impact on the quality of greedy global models.

References Powered by Scopus

Automatic labeling of semantic roles

1223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Large margin classification using the perceptron algorithm

871Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Multicategory support vector machines: Theory and application to the classification of microarray data and satellite radiance data

549Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Frame-based continuous lexical semantics through exponential family tensor factorization and semantic proto-roles

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wolfe, T., Dredze, M., & van Durme, B. (2016). A study of imitation learning methods for semantic role labeling. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Structured Prediction for Natural Language Processing, NLP 2016 at the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2016 (pp. 44–53). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w16-5905

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 22

73%

Researcher 5

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 28

78%

Linguistics 5

14%

Engineering 2

6%

Neuroscience 1

3%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0