Cost associated with venous thromboembolism treatment in the community

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim was to compare the costs of treating venous thromboembolism in three possible clinical settings, either in-hospital, or out-of-hospital, by means of an anticoagulation clinic or by treatment at home. Initial treatment of venous thromboembolism involves the initiation of anticoagulation and the provision of concomitant antithrombotic therapy for 5-7 days, consisting of monitored, dose-adjusted, unfractionated heparin, given in-hospital, or low molecular weight heparin, given in a once-daily weight-adjusted dose, either in- or out-of-hospital. The cost model assumes that outcomes do not vary relative to the treatment administered. Costs were categorised under drug costs, administration costs and costs associated with care, both in- and out-of-hospital. Our study showed that savings can be made using Clexane* (enoxaparin) treatment without hospital admission. Total expected costs of enoxaparin provided in the community, incorporating nurse visits, were £241.70. The anticoagulation clinic costs were £433.70, compared with in-hospital unfractionated heparin at £1,183.13. Acute venous thromboembolism treatment in the community reduces costs, providing an incentive to manage patients out-of-hospital.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, D. J., Burrell, A. D., & Bearne, A. (2002). Cost associated with venous thromboembolism treatment in the community. Journal of Medical Economics, 5(1–10), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3111/200205001010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free