Comparative linkage meta-analysis reveals regionally-distinct, disparate genetic architectures: Application to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia

11Citations
Citations of this article
59Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

New high-throughput, population-based methods and next-generation sequencing capabilities hold great promise in the quest for common and rare variant discovery and in the search for "missing heritability." However, the optimal analytic strategies for approaching such data are still actively debated, representing the latest rate-limiting step in genetic progress. Since it is likely a majority of common variants of modest effect have been identified through the application of tagSNP-based microarray platforms (i.e., GWAS), alternative approaches robust to detection of low-frequency (1-5% MAF) and rare (<1%) variants are of great importance. Of direct relevance, we have available an accumulated wealth of linkage data collected through traditional genetic methods over several decades, the full value of which has not been exhausted. To that end, we compare results from two different linkage meta-analysis methods-GSMA and MSP-applied to the same set of 13 bipolar disorder and 16 schizophrenia GWLS datasets. Interestingly, we find that the two methods implicate distinct, largely non-overlapping, genomic regions. Furthermore, based on the statistical methods themselves and our contextualization of these results within the larger genetic literatures, our findings suggest, for each disorder, distinct genetic architectures may reside within disparate genomic regions. Thus, comparative linkage meta-analysis (CLMA) may be used to optimize low-frequency and rare variant discovery in the modern genomic era. © 2011 Tang et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tang, B., Thornton-Wells, T., & Askland, K. D. (2011). Comparative linkage meta-analysis reveals regionally-distinct, disparate genetic architectures: Application to bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. PLoS ONE, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019073

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free