Cost-effectiveness of vibegron for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States

5Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vibegron compared with other oral pharmacologic therapies as treatment for overactive bladder (OAB). Methods: A semi-Markov model with monthly cycles was developed to support a lifetime horizon of vibegron 75 mg from a US commercial payor or Medicare perspective. The model incorporated efficacy (reductions in daily micturitions and urinary incontinence episodes), adverse events, OAB-related comorbidities, drug–drug interactions, anticholinergic burden, and treatment persistence. Direct costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were accumulated over time. The primary outcome was the cost per QALY incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) were performed. Results: For commercial payors, vibegron was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $50,000/QALY versus mirabegron 50 mg (ICER, $9,311) and at a WTP threshold of $150,000/QALY versus mirabegron 25 mg (ICER, $141,957) and versus an anticholinergic basket based on market share (ICER, $118,121). For Medicare, vibegron was cost-effective at a WTP threshold of $50,000/QALY versus mirabegron 50 mg (ICER, $12,154) and at a WTP threshold of $100,000/QALY versus mirabegron 25 mg (ICER, $99,150) and versus an anticholinergic market basket (ICER, $60,756). For commercial payors and Medicare, OWSAs for vibegron versus mirabegron indicated cost-effectiveness was most sensitive to vibegron persistence at 1 and 12 months. PSAs indicated that vibegron was cost-effective versus mirabegron 50 mg 98.6% and 100% of the time at $50,000/QALY for commercial payors and Medicare payors, respectively. Limitations: Due to lack of real-world data available on persistence, vibegron was assumed to have the same persistence as mirabegron 50 mg. Long-term efficacy was assumed to be sustained beyond 52 weeks in the absence of clinical trials longer than 52 weeks. Conclusions: Vibegron is cost-effective from a commercial payor (WTP threshold $150,000/QALY) and Medicare (WTP threshold $100,000/QALY) perspective when compared with other oral pharmacologic treatments for OAB.

References Powered by Scopus

Recommendations for conduct, methodological practices, and reporting of cost-effectiveness analyses: Second panel on cost-effectiveness in health and medicine

2317Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Updating cost-effectiveness - The curious resilience of the $50,000-per-QALY threshold

1819Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing cost-effectiveness in healthcare: History of the $50,000 per QALY threshold

542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Penny-wise but Pound-foolish: The Hidden Costs of Step Therapy for Overactive Bladder

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Bridging Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Vibegron in Treating Korean Patients With Overactive Bladder

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Characteristics of providers who prescribed only anticholinergic medications for overactive bladder in 2020

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J. V., Klein, T. M., Nesheim, J., & Mudd, P. N. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of vibegron for the treatment of overactive bladder in the United States. Journal of Medical Economics, 25(1), 1092–1100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2022.2115754

Readers over time

‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

100%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

100%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0