Victim-offender mediation with juveniles in poland

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conclusions: The experience of Poland may be useful for other countries, because it shows how we promoted VOM as well as additional problems. Even with the legal basis to carry out VOM, it is not easy to develop it in practice. A lot has been achieved, but it is clear that there is a continuous need to promote, explain, encourage and, of course, evaluate mediation practice. Therefore there is a need to create systems of data collection and evaluation. The most important aspect of VOM promotion seems to be keeping judges informed and interested in mediation in order to increase the number of referrals. The best way to achieve this goal seems to let them experience what VOM is through trainings or workshops. VOM should be included in regular courses for criminal justice officials and students, as well as policemen, who might play a role in promoting mediation directly to the parties. Another problem is that efforts in developing VOM practice are based on huge efforts of a relatively small group of people, who are just volunteers, without payment. There is a lack of organisational structure, and a lack of finances to employ staff. These aspects should also be strengthened. © 2005 Springer.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Czarnecka-Dzialuk, B., & Wójcik, D. (2005). Victim-offender mediation with juveniles in poland. In Victim-Offender Mediation with Youth Offenders in Europe: An Overview and Comparison of 15 Countries (pp. 137–153). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3879-8_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free