This study aims to reconstruct the waá¸â€™Ä« law in uṣūl fiqh. This reconstruction is important considering the facts: mubá¹il which is always cited in fiqh, has no referrence to uṣūl fiqh, the ambiguity of waá¸â€™Ä«â€™s definition and its unsystematic function as explained in uṣūl fiqh. The reconstruction of waá¸â€™Ä« law in this article consisted of: 1) adding mubá¹il to waá¸â€™Ä« law. Mubá¹il, as a decree of Allah (khiá¹ÄbullÄh) which stipulates something as the cause of the cancellation of acts, is required in law because it is needed in explaining the law of acts, it is not the opposite of conditions (syará¹), and the decree (khiá¹Äb) about mubá¹il is found in the Qur’an; 2) ‘azÄ«mah should also be determened as khiá¹ÄbullÄh, which stipulates something as a special reason for the enactment of general law from special law, in addition to the initial definition. 3) the waá¸â€™Ä« law should be defined implicitly and exclusively as khiá¹ÄbullÄh, assigned something as determinant factor or measurement for mukallaf’s (legal subjects) deeds. 4) Restructuring of waá¸â€™Ä« law according to its function, i.e. by measuring taklÄ«fÄ« law, it must be divided into three parts systematically, namely: pre-acts (sabab-mÄni`-rukhá¹£ah-’azÄ«mah), in acts (syará¹-mubá¹il), and post-acts (á¹£aḥīhÌ£-bÄá¹il).
CITATION STYLE
Siregar, A. S. (2018). Rekonstruksi Hukum Wad’iy: Pembaharuan Usul Fikih dan Respon terhadap Kajian Fikih. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 12(2), 233–246. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v12i2.1762
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.