Prescribing unapproved medical devices? The case of DIY artificial pancreas systems

16Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In response to slow progress regarding technological innovations to manage type 1 diabetes, some patients have created unregulated do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIY APS). Yet both in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally, there is an almost complete lack of specific guidance – legal, regulatory, or ethical – for clinicians caring for DIY APS users. Uncertainty regarding their professional obligations has led to them being cautious about discussing DIY APS with patients, let alone recommending or prescribing them. In this article, we argue that this approach threatens to undermine trust and transparency. Analysing the professional guidance from the UK regulator – the General Medical Council – we demonstrate that nothing within it ought to be interpreted as precluding clinicians from initiating discussions about DIY APS. Moreover, in some circumstances, it may require that clinicians do so. We also argue that the guidance does not preclude clinicians from prescribing such unapproved medical devices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roberts, J. T. F., Moore, V., & Quigley, M. (2021). Prescribing unapproved medical devices? The case of DIY artificial pancreas systems. Medical Law International, 21(1), 42–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0968533221997510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free