Maxilla and Mandible

  • Raghavan P
  • Jameson M
  • Hubbard M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of this study aim was to determine whether elastic properties and apparent density of bone differ in different anatomical regions of the maxilla and mandible. Additional analyses assessed how elastic properties and apparent density were related. Four pairs of edentulous maxilla and mandibles were retrieved from fresh human cadavers. Bone samples from four anatomical regions (maxillary anterior, maxillary posterior, mandibular anterior, mandibular posterior) were obtained. Elastic modulus (EM) and hardness (H) were measured using the nano-indentation technique. Bone samples containing cortical and trabecular bone were used to measure composite apparent density (cAD) using Archimedes’ principle. Statistical analyses used repeated measures ANOVA and Pearson correlations. Bone physical properties differed between regions of the maxilla and mandible. Generally, mandible had higher physical property measurements than maxilla. EM and H were higher in posterior than in anterior regions; the reverse was true for cAD. Posterior maxillary cAD was significantly lower than that in the three other regions. Keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raghavan, P., Jameson, M. J., Hubbard, M. A., Wintermark, M., & Mukherjee, S. (2014). Maxilla and Mandible. In Manual of Head and Neck Imaging (pp. 321–341). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40377-4_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free