Advancing Public Service Logic: moving towards an ecosystemic framework for value creation in the public service context

32Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper argues that the theoretical foundation for studying the ecosystemic nature of value creation is lacking within the public service logic (PSL). To address this limitation, the paper uses a theory synthesis to clarify service-related key concepts and develop four premises that position PSL as an ecosystemic framework. These premises 1) position PSL as a mid-range theoretical framework, 2) propose the service ecosystem as an analytical framework, 3) define service (not services) as the basis for PSL, and 4) acknowledge the mediating role of the public service organization in value co-creation. Research directions guide the future development of PSL.

References Powered by Scopus

Evolving to a New Dominant Logic for Marketing

9631Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution

5093Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation

4168Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Public value creation mechanisms in the context of public service logic: an integrated conceptual framework

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Citizens’ conscious engagement in digital platforms: advancing public service delivery within the public service logic framework

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

OK computer: applying the public service logic on digital health services

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Trischler, J., Røhnebæk, M., Edvardsson, B., & Tronvoll, B. (2023). Advancing Public Service Logic: moving towards an ecosystemic framework for value creation in the public service context. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2023.2229836

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

72%

Researcher 4

14%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 11

44%

Business, Management and Accounting 9

36%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3

12%

Computer Science 2

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free